Get Rid of Church Members (Rewind)

I have been in full-time ministry with LifeChurch.tv for going on two years now. I have recently come to the conclusion that it’s time to get rid of church members. I had this epiphany as my team, a Starbucks manager, and the principal of an impoverished elementary school were meeting to talk about our upcoming endeavors. As we visited, the manager made reference to the role of Starbucks partners.  When I asked for clarification, she stated that partner is the new term used to refer to a Starbucks employee. This just further confirms for me how ingenious Starbucks is. It now refers to every individual who makes our coffee experience amazing as partner. Though this is a subtle shift, I believe it will have lasting results.   

It’s time for us to get rid of our church members and make them our ministry partners.  When we empower the people who walk through our doors to be partners, it increases their sense of commitment and ownership. I consistently meet volunteers who feel the need to be frequently reminded of the importance of their contribution. Allowing the Church to be our ministry partners reinforces the importance of everyone’s contribution to the mission. Personally, I have several memberships – to clubs, gyms, organizations, Netflix – in which I ask the question, “How can you benefit me?” I have only a few partnerships in which I ask the question, “What can we do daily together to achieve our desired mission?” Read the definitions below, and then ask yourself this question: Do we need to get rid of church members and begin to develop ministry partners? 

member – a person, animal, plant group, etc., that is part of a society, party, community, taxon, or other body. 

partner – a person who shares or is associated with another in some action or endeavor; associate; a husband or a wife; spouse. 

Ministries around the country are evolving, changing, becoming more relevant; it’s now time get rid of the dated idea of having church members and instead develop ministry partners.   What Do you think, share your thoughts!

  • http://cindybeall.wordpress.com Cindy Beall

    Brilliant concept, Scott. I think that church members have had the “How can you benefit me?” mindset for way to long. IT’S ABOUT THE LOST! And in serving and partnering with our church communities, we will be fed and nurtured and stretched in our faith.

  • http://www.manymeadows.blogspot.com Robin

    I like it—it’s like being a “family member”. And I’m all about family!

  • http://dturn.wordpress.com david

    Partner brings to mind “giving and receiving”.
    It also means that we are partners in the “church worldwide”, not just our local body.

    I love it!!

  • http://www.updatable.cc Scott Magdalein

    Makes perfect sense. The concept of membership is an exclusionary idea. It sounds like a country-club with an unwritten dress code, secret entrances, and confusing traditions and lingo.
    Calling people partners not only helps kill the exclusionary culture in churches, but also promotes openness, shared responsibility, and participation.

  • http://www.greenups.com greenup

    A rerun? I thought the writer’s strike would Never affect the blogging industry… :-)
    .
    but the thought is excellent, and definitely deserves more consideration.

  • http://princessjes.wordpress.com princessjes

    Scott, I LOVE it!!
    Didn’t you post something like this a long time ago?
    Anywho, not important…but i love the idea, because as the church, we are the body of Christ. If we are not partnering together to accomplish the mission of Christ…what are we doing?
    Ephesians 4:16 says it best, “from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by what every joint supplies…by which every part does its share, causes growth of the body…”

  • http://www.floatingaxhead.com michael

    i think member is kind of like christian…not in the bible. why can’t we just be people, brothers, beloved…oh, i know, because without tags, people’s expectations would be minimal, and that is usually of themselves. i think membership was created to imply some eternal rewards due them but in reality it is used to distinguish the responsibilities required of them, and we just hate that in the church…you know we just like to browse…

  • Scott Williams

    Cindy- Thanks!
    Robin- Family is right!
    David- I agree about the “church” worldwide.
    Scott- Yes Sir!
    Greenup- Thank you!
    Jess- I did post this about 4 months ago… (Rewind)
    Michael- “i think member is kind of like christian…not in the bible” hmmmmm

  • http://princessjes.wordpress.com princessjes

    Thanks Scott…i see that now & it makes sense, but you never said play so I wasn’t sure, thought we were still waiting for the darn thing to rewind.

  • http://www.laog.net/clifsblog Clif

    Well said Scott, I have been working this change into my congregation. I tell them membership has privileges, but partnership has responsibility. Members say serve us, partners say service. Members want what is best for them, partners want what is best for the organization. So down with church membership!

  • http://www.DPLUM.org D-PLUM

    Hey, Scott.. good stuff! They say that “great minds think alike”… this is true! We started off at Mosaic with partners, as opposed to memmbers. We didn’t want to create a “club” environment, but one where people shared in the ministry. Thanks for this post!

  • http://jimmyparavanesblog.blogspot.com/ jimmy paravane

    Does this mean I have to make the popcorn or I get to make the popcorn? Existential minds want to know!(grin)

  • http://www.blog.aaronhavens.com aaron

    the places i contribute seem to have the most meaning for me, more of my dedication. Love it!

  • http://www.bigisthenewsmall.com Scott Williams

    Jess- LOL
    Clif- Partners, what’s best for the team. Sounds like a marriage.
    D-Plum- Thanks bro. I was on your blog last night and checked out the video with the “funny %#@!#5 language.”
    Jimmy- Becasue you want to make it, you get to make it, becasue you get to make it, you are fired up about eating it.
    Aaron- Thanks bro, I always enjoy chatting w/ you.

  • http://jumainejones.wordpress.com Jumaine

    Good stuff, Scott. We don’t do membership at The Bridge either. Not to mention that no one ever became a member of the church in the New Testament. The church shouldn’t be an organization to join, but a movement to partner with.

  • Pingback: Big Is The New Small » LifeChurch.tv gets rid of Church Members, No Longer a Mega-Church

  • Pingback: Big Is The New Small » Lessons I Learned While In Prison 1 (of 4)

  • Pingback: Church community sucks because it’s watered down « Ipiphanist (Show + Tell)

  • Pingback: Big Is The New Small - I Was In Prison… Now I’m A Pastor

Designed by EightDay Studio. Powered by the Standard Theme. Developed by Milk Engine.