Agree To Disagree or Agree To Agree
The term “agree to disagree” or “agreeing to disagree” is a phrase in referring to the resolution of a conflict (usually a debate or quarrel) in which all parties tolerate but do not accept the opposing position or positions.
Agreeing to disagree generally occurs when all sides recognize that further conflict would be unnecessary, ineffective, undesirable or simply doesn’t make sense. Both parties may remain on amicable terms while continuing to disagree about the unresolved issues.
This now popular phrase first appeared in print in 1770 when, at the death of George Whitefield, John Wesley wrote a memorial sermon which acknowledged, but downplayed, the two men’s doctrinal differences. Wesley wrote and said it this way:
“There are many doctrines of a less essential nature… In these we may think and let think; we may ‘agree to disagree.’ But, meantime, let us hold fast the essentials…”
Often times we use the term “agree to disagree” as a somewhat of cop-out for saying, “I don’t agree, but I’m going to say that I agree to disagree so that I can move on because my opinion is right and you’re wrong.” It really is okay to “agree to disagree” and if we take a play out of Wesley’s nearly 250 year old sermon; let’s simply make sure that we hold fast to the essentials and the things that we agree on. Unfortunately Pastors and Christians can be some of the worst, even with limited knowledge and perspective of the “other side.”
Maybe the phrase should be, “agree to agree.” Let’s agree to sometimes disagree, but more importantly let’s not forget the things that we agree on. The next argument, political perspective, denominational nuance or ridiculous decision that you find yourself on the other side of — Don’t just make the decision to “agree to disagree,” take it a step further and “agree to agree.”
Share your thoughts and perspective on “agreeing to disagree.” Do people really “agree to disagree?” What are your thoughts on “agreeing to agree?”


















